Backcountry sleep comfort starts from the ground up, and the best backpacking sleeping pads ensure that your nights under the stars are restful, not restless.
Leveraging the collective experience of some of the best backwoods snoozers out there, we’ve pulled together the most solid options in 2025, along with our trail-worn opinions on each. Triple Crown thru-hiker Chris Carter has curated our list, and while testing each model, we focused on a number of key metrics.
To merit any real estate in this guide, every pad we blew up had to demonstrate outstanding durability, comfort, and insulation. We paid special attention to pack size, warmth-to-weight ratios, and ease of inflation. Rest assured — we would depend on anything in this roundup for our backcountry beauty sleep.
No stone was left unturned in an effort to narrow in on the most deserving pads for this guide. Right off the bat, the Therm-a-Rest NeoAir XLite NXT proved to be our favorite combination of warmth and packability, and the Klymit Static V emerged as a great budget compromise.
Editor’s Note: We updated our Backpacking Sleeping Pad guide on August 29, 2025 to add our new favorite self-inflating sleeping pad, the Sea to Summit Pursuit. We’ve also added new rating attributes to each pad to make comparison easier when you’re choosing between similar options.
The Best Backpacking Sleeping Pads of 2025
Best Overall Backpacking Sleeping Pad
Therm-a-Rest NeoAir XLite NXT
9.7/10 RatingJump to review
BUY OPTIONS
Check Price at REI Check Price at Backcountry
Best Budget Backpacking Sleeping Pad
Klymit Static V
6.5/10 RatingJump to review
BUY OPTIONS
Check Price at BackcountryCheck Price at Klymit
Best Ultralight Backpacking Sleeping Pad
NEMO Tensor Elite Sleeping Pad
9.3/10 RatingJump to review
BUY OPTIONS
Check Price at REICheck Price at Backcountry
Most Comfortable Backpacking Sleeping Pad
Therm-a-Rest NeoLoft Sleeping Pad
8.9/10 RatingJump to review
BUY OPTIONS
Check Price at REICheck Price at Backcountry
Best Winter Expedition Sleeping Pad
Therm-a-Rest NeoAir XTherm NXT
9.5/10 RatingJump to review
BUY OPTIONS
Check Price at REICheck Price at Backcountry
Best Self-Inflating Sleeping Pad
Sea to Summit Pursuit Sleeping Pad
7.9/10 RatingJump to review
BUY OPTIONS
Check Price at REICheck Price at Backcountry
Most Indestructible Backpacking Sleeping Pad
NEMO Switchback
6.1/10 RatingJump to review
BUY OPTIONS
Check Price at REICheck Price at Backcountry
See more picks
Best Overall Backpacking Sleeping Pad
Therm-a-Rest NeoAir XLite NXT
Check Price at REI Check Price at Backcountry
9.7
How we rate products ⓘ
Rating Details
- Comfort 8.0
- Warmth 8.0
- Packed Size 9.0
- Material Durability 8.0
Specifications
- Weight: 13 oz.
- R-value: 4.5
- Thickness: 3″
- Lengths Available: Short (66"), Regular (72"), Large (77")
- Width: Regular (20"), Wide (25")
- Packed Size: 4.1" x 9" (regular)
- Shell Fabric: 30D ripstop HT nylon
- Insulation Type: ThermaCapture aluminized foil
Pros
- Super light for its high R-value
- Comfortable and sturdy
- Durable enough for 2,000+ mile thru-hikes
- Update is 6 times quieter than previous model
Cons
- Update adds 1 oz. (but is thicker and warmer)
- Still has some crinkle to it
Read Review: Therm-a-Rest Neo Air XLite NXT Review: A Killer Sleeping Pad Just Got Better (And Quieter)
The classic pick for thru-hikers or backcountry adventurers who need ultralight simplicity in a durable package, the time-tested NeoAir lineup gets a treasured update with the new Therm-a-Rest NeoAir XLite NXT ($210). Thru-hiker Chris Carter used the previous model alone for all three thru-hikes of the Triple Crown (AT, PCT, and CDT), and while most accrued their fair share of patches along the way, they kept him warm and cozy through all sorts of terrain and climates.
The XLite NXT uses a unique technology called a Triangular Core Matrix, which stacks two layers of triangular baffles to create a super stable surface while trapping as much heat as possible. This is merged with a material called ThermaCapture, which keeps the pad at a featherlight 13 ounces, while still boasting a comparatively stellar R-value of 4.5 (up from 4.2 in the last model).
The obvious question when you see such a light, warm pad is, “How long will it survive”? While it’s not as durable as some of the heavier denier pads we cover here, we can say from personal experience that if you take care of it, it’ll fend off punctures and slow leaks over months of torture.
This pad packs up tiny and disappears in your pack, yet offers superior comfort and warmth. It’s perfect for light or ultralight backpacking kits in pretty much any temperature you may encounter on a three-season thru-hike.
We recently took the new NXT pad on a winter backpacking trip through the Grand Canyon and were impressed by the comfy 3-inch height (a boost from its previous 2.5 inches) and improved insulation. For side-sleepers who tend to bottom out pads, this is a welcome change.
The WingLock valve used to inflate/deflate the pad is brilliant. A larger opening than previous iterations allows it to inflate fast, and a one-way flap means you can pause between breaths without having air escape. Opening the valve and twisting the wings deflates the pad swiftly — that’s the worst part of each morning.
Negatives? The biggest con to the XLite used to be how darn loud it was, but the NXT update targeted that directly, reducing the noise by 83%. We’ve taken this on several backpacking trips already and even slept in a small cave with three other campers. They all agreed that the noise was next to none, and it didn’t wake anybody up, no matter how much we squirmed around in the tight space. Nailed it, Therm-a-Rest!
In short, the NeoAir XLite NXT is one of the best lightweight, durable, and streamlined pads you can buy for long treks across the country or sporadic adventures into the mountains where weight and warmth are paramount.
(Photo/Nick Belcaster)
(photo/ Xiaoling Keller)
(photo/ Xiaoling Keller)
(photo/ Xiaoling Keller)
Best Budget Backpacking Sleeping Pad
Klymit Static V
Check Price at BackcountryCheck Price at Klymit
6.5
How we rate products ⓘ
Rating Details
- Comfort 7.0
- Warmth 6.0
- Packed Size 7.0
- Material Durability 6.0
Specifications
- Weight: 1 lb., 2.6 oz.
- R-value: 1.3
- Thickness: 2.5"
- Lengths Available: Regular (72")
- Width: Regular (23")
- Packed Size: 3" x 8"
- Shell Fabric: 75D polyester
- Insulation Type: N/A
Pros
- Packs compactly
- Affordable price
- Inflates fairly quickly
- Quiet
Cons
- Not very thick
- Lacking insulation with a low R-value
- Long-term durability concerns
Read Review: The Klymit Static V
The Klymit Static V ($65) is an incredible value. For less than 70 bucks, you can get a super-packable and quite comfortable backpacking pad. At a little over a pound, it’s not ultralight, but it’s certainly on the light end of the spectrum.
It packs down easily and only takes a few breaths to inflate. We’ve had one in testing that wore out after 6 months of hard use and stopped holding air, but we’ve had another in testing for more than 18 months with no durability concerns.
For the summertime backpacker on a budget, the infrequent camper, or someone looking to pad out their whole family, Static V is a killer value. It offers a significant bump up in comfort from a closed-cell foam pad. While not as light or plush as our pads from Therm-a-Rest or Big Agnes, we can confidently say you can get a good night’s sleep in warmer conditions.
Since the Static V isn’t as thick as some of its competitors, you’ll be able to inflate it more quickly. Your tent mates won’t need to worry about noise, as we could toss and turn in silence all night while testing.
If you sleep cold or camp during the fall or winter, you may want to consider a pad with a higher warmth rating. The Static also comes in a long and wide version if you need a little more wiggle room. They weigh and cost a bit more, but they’re a little more comfortable and still clock in under or around $100.
Best Ultralight Backpacking Sleeping Pad
NEMO Tensor Elite Sleeping Pad
Check Price at REICheck Price at Backcountry
9.3
How we rate products ⓘ
Rating Details
- Comfort 8.0
- Warmth 7.0
- Packed Size 9.0
- Material Durability 6.0
Specifications
- Weight: 8.5 oz. (regular mummy), 8.3 oz. without the stuff sack
- R-value: 2.4
- Thickness: 3"
- Lengths Available: Regular mummy (72") and short mummy (63")
- Width: 20"
- Packed Size: 3" x 5.5"
- Shell Fabric: 10D Cordura nylon ripstop
- Insulation Type: Aluminized film
Pros
- The lightest inflatable sleeping pad available
- Impressive durability
- Comfortable 3-inch thickness
- Relatively quiet
- Effective included pump sack
Cons
- Slightly slippery face fabric
- 2.4 R-value limits four-season use
Read Review: The Lightest Inflatable Sleeping Pad on the Market: Nemo Tensor Elite Review
Since the discontinuation of the Therm-a-Rest NeoAir UberLite, we’ve been on the hunt for a pad that focuses on shaving ounces without compromising too much on comfort. Now, the NEMO Tensor Elite ($230) is the lightest inflatable sleeping pad in the lineup at 8.3 ounces, and it has many of the same comfort-centric features found on other pads in the NEMO Tensor line.
The Tensor Elite is 3 inches thick. Even if you like a soft pad and don’t inflate it tightly, you’re not going to feel the ground. NEMO’s baffle construction distributes weight evenly, and while not totally silent, the 10D shell material is much quieter than the crinkly Therm-a-Rest pads from a few years back.
This pad has an R-value of 2.4, which is plenty for the summer and shoulder seasons. We’d recommend a pad with a higher R-value, like the NEMO Tensor Extreme, for backpacking in winter.
Inflation and deflation are a breeze with the two-stage valve that allows you to adjust the firmness of the pad by pushing on the valve. NEMO includes a pump sack, but we suspect the type of backpacker that’s into this pad will be leaving the pump sack at home.
The Therm-a-Rest UberLite that once held our top ultralight accolade was 2.5” thick, weighed 0.3 ounces more, and had an R-value of 2. Spec-wise, the Tensor Elite bests the UberLite in every way. A lot of the weight savings comes from the Tensor’s 10D nylon shell material, whereas the UberLite uses a slightly thicker and arguably more durable 15D nylon.
That being said, one tester used the Tensor Elite for over 100 nights on the Appalachian Trail. While he took care not to damage the pad, 100 nights without getting a hole and deflating is still mighty impressive for an 8.3-ounce pad.
The Tensor Elite is expensive, and there are warmer pads out there. Our top pick, the Therm-a-Rest NeoAir XLite NXT, is a better choice if you want one pad to use year-round. But for those who want to be so fast and light that they’re willing to cut off the handle of their toothbrush, the Tensor Elite is the way to go.
At 8.5 ounces, the NEMO Tensor Elite practically disappears in your pack, making it a true ultralight upgrade; (photo/Sam Schild)
The Laylow™ valve allows for quick inflation, fine-tuned firmness, and rapid deflation when packing up; (photo/Sam Schild)
The NEMO Tensor Elite’s 3-inch thickness provides stable support for back, side, and stomach sleepers; (photo/Sam Schild)
(Photo/Sam Schild)
Most Comfortable Backpacking Sleeping Pad
Therm-a-Rest NeoLoft Sleeping Pad
Check Price at REICheck Price at Backcountry
8.9
How we rate products ⓘ
Rating Details
- Comfort 9.0
- Warmth 7.0
- Packed Size 7.0
- Material Durability 8.0
Specifications
- Weight: 1 lb., 9 oz.
- R-value: 4.7
- Thickness: 4.6”
- Lengths Available: 73”
- Width: 22”
- Packed Size: 5.7” x 9.5”
- Shell Fabric: 50D poly knit (top), 75D poly knit (bottom)
- Insulated Type: ThermaCapture aluminized foil
Pros
- 4.6” of soft loft
- 4.7 R-value for year-round comfort
- Quiet
- Very soft and stretchy fabric
- TwinLock valves are easy to use
Cons
- Rolling off this sleeping pad hits different
- Heavier than most backpacking pads
Read Review: Therm-a-Rest NeoLoft Sleeping Pad Review: Car Camping Comfort That Fits in Your Pack
The Therm-a-Rest NeoLoft ($240) emphasizes warmth and comfort while barely compromising weight savings. If you’ve been intrigued by the superior packability of the NeoAir XLite, but need the cushion and comfort of a larger, thicker pad, the NeoLoft is twice as thick, has a 4.7 R-value, and only weighs 12 ounces more. That’s adding the equivalent of a beer can to your ultralight kit, and if it means better sleep in the backcountry, then it’s well worth the extra weight.
The brand has been the king of sleeping pads for a long time now, but it isn’t a stranger to innovation. The NeoLoft is constructed from a soft, stretchy knit fabric that’s quiet and comfortable and conforms to the body. It’s 50 denier on the top and 75 on the bottom, adding some durability compared to the NeoAir’s 30-D ripstop nylon. It’s also a main culprit contributing to the added weight. We found it to be very comfortable, with one tester describing it as supple and gel-like.
This pad is a whopping 4.6 inches thick — that’s an inch and a half more than the NeoAir, and an inch thicker than the Exped Dura 8R (the warmest pad in our guide). It’s only available in the rectangular shape, eschewing the weight savings of the mummy design, but that only makes it more comfortable.
If you’re a larger person, a pad this thick is going to feel awesome compared to the typical ultralight fare. The only complaint we have comfort-wise is that you don’t roll off this pad — you fall off. 4.6” is kind of a long way down, something serious toss-and-turners should consider.
Inflation with the included pump sack takes around a minute. There’s a lot of pad here to inflate, but using the pump sack won’t leave you breathless, and it will keep moisture out of the pad. A two-valve system borrowed from the brand’s camping mattresses allows for fast inflation and deflation. If you’re OK with the extra weight, we recommend the Flextail Tiny Pump 2X to speed up the process.
Comfort and weight savings are always going to be a compromise, but at least with the Therm-a-Rest NeoLoft, you’re compromising less. If you’re just not getting the sleep you need on an ultralight pad, the NeoLoft is the way to go.
(Photo/Nick LeFort)
(photo/Nick LeFort)
(Photo/Nick LeFort)
(Photo/Nick LeFort)
Best Winter Expedition Sleeping Pad
Therm-a-Rest NeoAir XTherm NXT
Check Price at REICheck Price at Backcountry
9.5
How we rate products ⓘ
Rating Details
- Comfort 8.0
- Warmth 9.0
- Packed Size 8.0
- Material Durability 8.0
Specifications
- Weight: 15.5 oz.
- R-value: 7.3
- Thickness: 3″
- Lengths Available: Regular (72"), Large (77")
- Width: Regular (20"), Wide (25")
- Packed Size: 4.9" x 9"
- Shell Fabric: 30D nylon top, 70D nylon bottom
- Insulation Type: ThermaCapture aluminized film
Pros
- Impressive 7.3 R-value warmth
- WingLock valve is one of the best we've used
- Rugged 70D bottom textile
- Solid pump sack included
- MAX version is ideal for longterm basecamps in cold places
Cons
- Not the absolute warmest pad out there
- Still some crinkle noise while sleeping
The Therm-a-Rest NeoAir XTherm NXT ($240) has an impressive 7.3 R-value, making it among the best winter-ready pads available. Borrowing a bit from the NeoAir XLite, the XTherm adds reflective layers to bounce your body heat back at you, and this pad is ready to sleep directly on snow.
We’ve used the XTherm on many cold-weather trips and expeditions, ranging from ski tour overnights to expeditions in the Brooks Range, and it always kept us warm. The 3″ pad thickness is just right for balancing weight and comfort, and the XTherm is offered in five different sizes (choose the mummy shape for cold-weather backpacking, and the rectangular ‘MAX’ for long-term expeditions when sleeping purely on snow).
Feedback from previous versions of the XTherm noted loud crinkling when moving around on the pad, but the most recent version significantly dampens this. The XTherm’s shell material is tough, with a 70D bottom textile mated to a 30D high-tenacity top. Senior Editor Nick Belcaster has used the same XTherm for 1,500 miles and still hasn’t put a hole in it!
A good pump sack is essential in sleeping pads used in below-freezing conditions, as any moisture from your breath will condense inside the pad. The XTherm has a solid option that securely attaches to the WingLock valve and inflates the pad with about 12 bagfuls of air.
The XTherm differentiates itself from the NEMO Tensor Extreme Conditions pad in a few ways, with overall warmth going to the NEMO (8.5 vs. 7.3 R-values). When comparing valves side by side, we prefer the WingLocks on the XTherm for its usability and the fact that the pump sack won’t disengage if inflated too high.
Overall, the NEMO edges out the XTherm in pure warmth, while the XTherm is more durable, lighter, and offered in a broader range of sizes. Both options are solid all-season choices, so consider your needs before deciding between them.
(Photo/Nick Belcaster)
(Photo/Nick Belcaster)
Best Self-Inflating Sleeping Pad
Sea to Summit Pursuit Sleeping Pad
Check Price at REICheck Price at Backcountry
7.9
How we rate products ⓘ
Rating Details
- Comfort 7.0
- Warmth 6.0
- Packed Size 6.0
- Durability 8.0
Specifications
- Weight: 1 lb., 5.3 oz. (Regular mummy)
- R-Value: 3
- Thickness: 2"
- Lengths Available: Regular, Large
- Width: Regular, Wide
- Packed Size: 5.5" x 11.4"
- Shell Material: 20D recycled exterior fabric
- Insulation Type: Closed-cell foam
Pros
- Comfortable
- Quiet
- Self-inflating
- Durable
Cons
- Only self inflates to ~65-75%
- Doesn't pack away very small
- Is on heavy end for backpacking sleeping pads
Read Review: No Crinkle, Extra Cushion: Sea to Summit Pursuit Self-Inflating Sleeping Pad Review
The Sea to Summit Pursuit Sleeping Pad ($139) is a self-inflating backpacking pad that cuts the crinkling of inflatable mattresses and provides a value-heavy option for those who might be light sleepers while camping.
GearJunkie Editor Will Brendza took this pad for a spin this spring and summer and found it to be surprisingly comfortable, given his experience with less-than-impressive self-inflating pads. Sea to Summit’s horizontal foam coring both increases comfort and limits the amount of foam used in order to cut weight. The pad sleeps more comfortably than the 2″ of thickness would lead you to believe, and the foam is to thank here.
The pad itself weighs 1 pound, 5.3 ounces in the regular mummy size, which is heavier than many of the pads we’ve reviewed for backpacking. That said, it isn’t the heaviest and certainly lighter than self-inflating pads of the past.
The ‘XPEL Valve’ is a game-changer when it comes to getting a self-inflating pad like the Pursuit down to a good packed size. It can be flipped around to offer one-way deflation and hold your progress as you roll it up. This is well-appreciated and key to getting the Pursuit down to the size of a football for storage.
This pad is quite similar to the NEMO Flyer, another self-inflator with very similar specs. The Pursuit is a bit wider and is available in more sizes. The Flyer, alternatively, weighs a bit less and has a slightly higher R-value (3.3 vs. 3). It really comes down to the valve for us, and we prefer the XPEL valve on the Pursuit for its one-way deflation abilities.
The price can’t quite match the bottom-dollar value of the $65 Klymit Static-V, but the Pursuit is about the best self-inflating backpacking pad out there for the money. If the crinkle keeps you from getting your shuteye in the backcountry, consider adding the Pursuit to your kit.
(Photo/Will Brendza)
(Photo/Will Brendza)
(Photo/Will Brendza)
(Photo/Will Brendza)
Most Indestructible Backpacking Sleeping Pad
NEMO Switchback
Check Price at REICheck Price at Backcountry
6.1
How we rate products ⓘ
Rating Details
- Comfort 6.0
- Warmth 6.0
- Packed Size 6.0
- Material Durability 9.0
Specifications
- Weight: 14.5 oz.
- R-value: 2.0
- Thickness: 0.9"
- Lengths Available: Regular (71"), Short (51")
- Width: 20"
- Packed Size: 5" x 5.5" x 20"
- Material: PE Foam
- Insulation Type: Thermal reflective film
Pros
- Dual-density foam offers plush comfort while still being supportive
- Taller nodes and smaller pack size than other models
- Indestructible
Cons
- Not as comfortable as inflatable pads
- Bulky pack size
Read Review: NEMO Switchback Ultralight Sleeping Pad Review: New Take on Classic Design
It’s hard to add even more innovation to the simple design and concept of an accordion-style foam pad, but the NEMO Switchback ($50-60 depending on length) continues to impress backpackers and campers with each new design and update.
Their latest iteration offers even greater plushness via taller nodes in a smaller pack size for a cozy, warm pad that will hold up to the wear and tear of weekend use or a months-long thru-hike. Plus, at $55, it’s a nice break for your wallet.
For years, the Therm-a-Rest Z Lite has been the industry’s foam pad standard, without much competition. Now, with the Switchback making a name for itself in the backpacking world, it’s not the only slab of foam seen strapped to hikers’ packs on the trail.
Though it’s 0.5 ounces heavier than the Z Lite and has the same R-value of 2, it’s a tad bit thicker, and we feel like it offers just a little more cushion and comfort. It’s definitely one of the best foam pads we’ve slept on.
A metalized thermal reflective film bounces heat back to your body, while dual-density Axiotomic foam provides a soft layer of comfort, paired with a tougher layer for support. This makes the pad a solid insulator on its own in milder temps, or a great way to add more comfort, protection, and warmth when paired with an inflatable pad on colder adventures.
While we haven’t had the chance to put it through a 2,000+ mile trek yet, it’s shown little wear and tear as we’ve tested it, and a plethora of online comments praise its durability and comfort over the length of a taxing thru-hike. We’d say you don’t have to worry about this falling apart any time soon.
As an ultralight standalone pad for fast and light missions or another addition to your sleep system for freezing expeditions, the NEMO Switchback will have you in a deep, comfortable slumber every night.
(Photo/Chip Fieberg)
(Photo/Chip Fieberg)
(Photo/Darren Steinbach)
Other Trail-Worthy Pads We Tested
While the following pads aren’t our editors’ absolute favorites, they’re all good options depending on your specific needs. If none of our award-winning picks pique your interest, check out these field-tested pads.
Sea to Summit Ether Lite XR PRO
Check Price at REICheck Price at Backcountry
8.5
How we rate products ⓘ
Rating Details
- Comfort 9.0
- Warmth 8.0
- Packed Size 8.0
- Material Durability 8.0
Specifications
- Weight: 1 lb., 3.8 oz.
- R-value: 7.4
- Thickness: 3.9"
- Lengths Available: Regular (72")
- Width: 25.2"
- Packed Size: 5.3" x 9.4"
- Material: 30/40D nylon with TPU lamination
- Insulation Type: Multi-layer TRM reflective insulation
Pros
- Quick inflation
- Comfortable
- Quiet
- Tough (for a lightweight sleeping pad)
Cons
- Heavier compared to a few pads on our list with a similar R-value
Tough, warm, and quiet, the Sea To Summit Ether Lite XR Pro ($229) can’t edge out our top pick spec for spec, but it has a few advantages over the Therm-a-Rest XLite NXT when used in the field. Mainly, it’s much quieter and feels more comfortable to a few of our testers. If your hiking buddies or partner can’t stand the crinkle of the XLite pads, the Ether Lite Pro keeps the noise down while you snooze the night away.
With an R-value of 7.4, the Ether Lite XR Pro is well suited for winter camping, at least in most lower 48. Other versions of the Ether Lite have elicited some complaints about cold spots due to the way the TMR layers are welded together. Our tester spent a night at 8,000 feet with temps in the upper teens and didn’t experience any cold spots. He also tested the Therm-a-Rest XTherm that night and was asked by his partner to switch to the Ether Lite since it’s so much quieter and doesn’t crinkle when he shifted positions.
Inflation bags are standard in the modern sleeping pad, and the Ether Lite Pro arrives with one built into its stuff sack. The valve can be adjusted from one to two-way operation. This pad is almost 4 inches thick when fully inflated, so there’s plenty of wiggle room for adjustment. You can let out some air for a softer pad and still have plenty of insulated space between you and the ground.
Weight is the only issue we have with the Ether Lite Pro. The regular mummy-shaped version we tested has an R-value of 7.4 and weighs 19.8 ounces. Compare that to the NEMO Tensor Extreme Conditions, with an R-value of 8.5 at just 17 ounces. Or the Therm-a-rest Neo Air NXT, weighing in at 15.5 ounces with an R-value of 7.3. We may be splitting hairs here, but ounce for ounce, the Ether Lite doesn’t come out on top.
Where are those ounces coming from? Multiple layers of TMR reflective insulation certainly add some weight. But we suspect most of the “heft” can be attributed to the 30-denier nylon used on the top of the pad and the 40-denier on the bottom. You don’t want your pad to pop. Consider that many ultralight tents use 10-denier nylon, as does the Mountain Hardwear Ghost Whisperer down jacket. 40-denier is substantial and durable. And anecdotally, the Ether Lite Pro feels more durable than other pads we tested.
(photo/Matt Bento)
(photo/Matt Bento)
NEMO Tensor Extreme Conditions
Check Price at REICheck Price at Backcountry
9.2
How we rate products ⓘ
Rating Details
- Comfort 8.0
- Warmth 9.0
- Packed Size 8.0
- Material Durability 8.0
Specifications
- Weight: 1 lb., 1 oz. (Regular Mummy)
- R-value: 8.5
- Thickness: 3.5"
- Material: 20D and 40D GRS-certified & Bluesign-approved nylon
Pros
- Best warmth-to-weight ratio on the market
- Small pack size
- Durable construction despite light weight
- Quick inflation time
- Quiet
Cons
- Extremely difficult to fit into stuff sack
- Slippery material
- Not our favorite valve construction
Read Review: Warmth-to-Weight King: NEMO Tensor Extreme Conditions Sleeping Pad Review
The new NEMO Tensor Extreme Conditions ($250) (EC) pad boldly claims to have the best warmth-to-weight ratio on the market. And well — objectively — they’re not wrong. We brought the EC on several chilly fall backpacking trips, overnight climbing excursions in Appalachia, and even a frigid five-day ascent of El Cap in Yosemite to truly test its mettle.
Capitalizing on NEMO’s established sleeping pad tech, Thermal Mirror Insulation, and new Apex baffles churn out serious heat without packing on pounds. For stellar warmth at an ultralight weight, this is quite literally as good as it gets. An 8.5 R-value at an impressively low 17 ounces — with a 3.5-inch stack height — is plenty to blow the pad’s competition out of the water. No existing pad touches these stats. And, in our experience, it’s not all talk.
We were stunned at how well it protected us from cold seeping in from the granite while sleeping on ledges in Yosemite. This is due to a new tech called “Apex Baffles” within the pad, which are four layers of thermal film placed over trapezoidal trusses. These reflect body heat back at the user, guard against radiant heat loss, while also deflecting cold from the ground. This design cuts weight, boosts heat, and is shockingly quiet.
It’s not perfect, however: During our first night with the EC, we quickly realized we very much disliked its stuff sack. You have to roll it up with factory precision if you want to stow it easily, and it’s more difficult if you dare to add the included pump sack. Considering the EC is designed for use in ungodly temps, this is the last thing you want to fumble with as you try to retain the feeling in your fingers on freezing alpine starts.
Additionally, the fabric is on the slippery side, and the pad is a bit narrow compared to its competition, resulting in limbs sliding off occasionally at midnight. Also, the valve construction isn’t our favorite. It can be a pain to inflate or top off by mouth. For pure ease of use, we think that the Therm-a-Rest NeoAir XTherm is a better all-around cold-weather pad for most backpackers.
For the ultralight madmen braving arctic temps on hunting excursions or winter thru-hikes, you may have just stumbled across the backcountry bed of your dreams, however. If you’re after warmth over all else, the Tensor Extreme Conditions pad is where it’s at.
Big Agnes Rapide SL Insulated Sleeping Pad
$150 at REICheck Price at Backcountry
8.1
How we rate products ⓘ
Rating Details
- Comfort 7.0
- Warmth 7.0
- Packed Size 7.0
- Material Durability 8.0
Specifications
- Weight: 1 lb., 2 oz. (regular)
- R-value: 4.8
- Thickness: 4.25"
- Lengths Available: Petite (66"), Regular (72"), Long (78')
- Width: Regular (20"), Wide (25")
- Packed Size: 4" x 7" (regular)
- Material: Nylon double ripstop
- Insulation Type: Aluminized film
Pros
- Comfortable
- Great warmth-to-weight ratio
- Compact and easy to carry
Cons
- Standard size is small
Read Review: Cut Weight, Boost Warmth: Big Agnes Retools Bestselling Rapide SL Sleeping Pad (Review)
Big Agnes is no stranger to the sleeping pads scene, and comfort has always been a top priority of the brand’s ethos. The newly re-tooled Rapide SL ($149) is super comfortable due to its supportive offset I-beam construction, 4.8 R-value, and quiet shell material.
We tested this pad on rocky terrain and weren’t at all careful with it. We saw no punctures and experienced no midnight deflation events, though Big Agnes does include a handy repair kit just in case. The kit includes some 3M patches and glue, and we’ve found them to be quite effective in the past. Locating leaks can be tricky, but a well-placed patch can make the pad as good as new.
On the warmth-to-weight spectrum, the Rapide SL has a respectable balance, with a weight of 18 ounces and a 4.8 R-value. Compared to the NEMO Tensor Insulated (15 ounces, R-value 5.4) and the Therm-a-Rest NeoAir XLite NXT (4.5 ounces, R-value 4.5), the Rapide looks pretty competitive. It’s also less expensive.
Big Agnes provides a pump sack to inflate the pad without introducing moisture to the inside, or you can just throw caution to the wind and use your mouth. Either way, it inflates in under a minute. The dual valve system makes it easy to make micro-adjustments and find the firmness to your liking.
One of our testers found the standard 20” x 72” size less than spacious, even for her 5’6” frame, and recommends purchasing a larger (heavier and more expensive) size if you’re a side sleeper or prone to tossing and turning.
If you’re under six feet, the standard size presents an undeniable value thanks to its impressive warmth-to-weight ratio, and while the Rapide SL is on the tippy top of our list, it’s very much worth your consideration if you’re on a budget.
NEMO Quasar 3D Insulated
$160 at REI$140 at Backcountry
7.0
How we rate products ⓘ
Rating Details
- Comfort 8.0
- Warmth 6.0
- Packed Size 7.0
- Material Durability 7.0
Specifications
- Pad Type: Air
- Sleeping Area: 72" x 20" (Regular)
- Weight: 1 lb., 12 oz.
- Packed Size: 8" x 4.5" rolled
- R-value: 3.3
- Thickness: 3.5"
- Material: 30-denier polyester ripstop
Pros
- Excellent packed size
- Body-contoured pad baffles and elevated head
- Vortex pump sack works great
- Great option for side sleepers
Cons
- Finicky valve system
- Not quite as warm as comparable pads
The NEMO Quasar 3D Insulated ($160) is a versatile backpacking and camping pad with a larger-than-average surface area and thickness. It is a comfort-first option for those who want a bit more luxury in the backcountry.
At 3.5” thick, this rectangular pad has plenty of space to spread out on, and it builds in a unique 3D architecture to add a curve side-to-side and at the head end to cradle your body. If you’ve ever had trouble falling off smaller mummy-shaped pads, this shape may be the ticket for you, and we found it kept us smack-dab in the center all night.
There are both an insulated and a non-insulated version of the pad, though we think only the insulated version is worth considering, as even at an R-value of 3.3, it’s a little on the cooler side. That lower R-value can be a bonus if you’re after a hot-weather sleeping pad, but for sneaking into the early spring or fall, you’ll want an extra foam pad to use beneath it.
Stacked up beside the new Therm-a-Rest NeoLoft, the Quasar 3D unfortunately just can’t catch much of a break. Not only is the NeoLoft larger in every dimension (1” longer, 2” wider, 1” thicker), but it weighs the same, and has a higher R-value of 4.7, due to the ThermaCapture reflective layers.
Price, however, is where the Quasar 3D has got the Therm-a-Rest licked, and you’ll need to shell out $70-80 more for the comparable NeoLoft pad. This price difference is significant; for some, the savings will make the difference in specifications. You’ll get the same pad, and so long as your trips don’t take you far into the shoulder season, the Quasar makes a value-heavy alternative.
Big Agnes Zoom UL Insulated Sleeping Pad
Check price at REICheck price at Backcountry
7.9
How we rate products ⓘ
Rating Details
- Comfort 7.0
- Warmth 7.0
- Packed Size 8.0
- Material Durability 7.0
Specifications
- Weight: 14 oz.
- R-value: 4.3
- Thickness: 3.5"
- Lengths Available: Regular (70"), Long (78")
- Width: Regular (20"), Wide (25")
- Packed Size: 4" x 8"
- Shell Material: Nylon ripstop
- Insulation Type: Aluminized film
Pros
- Lightest weight pad in the Big Agnes lineup
- Ample protection from the cold in most conditions
Cons
- Single valve makes it hard to deflate the pad
- Slippery surface
Read Review: Big Agnes’ Lightest Sleeping Pad Yet: Zoom UL Review
A great balance of weight and comfort, the Big Agnes Zoom UL ($179) is just an ounce heavier than the lightest pad in our guide, and it has a larger surface area. Unlike the Therm-a-Rest NeoAir Xlite NXT, this pad is only available in a wider rectangular shape. While this isn’t the “optimal” shape for weight savings, it’s definitely a more optimal shape for comfort.
Continuing with the comfort theme, this pad is 3.5” thick and a little thicker on the sides to help you stay on it through the night. Two layers of heat-reflecting film help the pad achieve a respectable R-value of 4.3. This is warm enough to use as a 3-season pad in most of the lower 48. Our tester used the Zoom UL camping all over the U.S., from Bryce Canyon to southern Illinois, sleeping in temperatures ranging from the high 70s to the low 20s.
The main gripe we have with this pad involves the valve system. We have no trouble inflating this pad, but when it comes time to deflate the pad to pack it away, the two-way valve proves a bit finicky. To deflate the pad, you stick a little tab on the side of the valve cover into the valve to hold it open while you squeeze the air out. A clever design that shaves some ounces for sure, but the tab would frequently fall out of the valve, making the packing process cumbersome compared to Big Agnes’ Rapide SL, which has a second valve dedicated to deflation.
Folks who are willing to carry just a few extra ounces than our top picks in exchange for more real estate and a slightly more comfortable sleep experience should put the Big Agnes Zoom UL on their short list. Sometimes “light is right” goes a little too far, and we’d argue that better sleep can equate to more miles hiked.
NEMO Tensor Trail
Check Price at REICheck Price at Backcountry
7.9
How we rate products ⓘ
Rating Details
- Comfort 8.0
- Warmth 6.0
- Packed Size 7.0
- Material Durability 7.0
Specifications
- Weight: 13.9 oz.
- R-value: 2.8
- Thickness: 3"
- Lengths Available: Regular (72"), Long (76")
- Width: Regular (20"), Wide (25")
- Packed Size: 4" x 10"
- Shell Material: 20D nylon top, 40D nylon bottom
- Insulation Type: Thermal Mirror metallized film layers
Pros
- Very comfortable
- Remains quiet when rolling around
- Stable yet plush
Cons
- Not the warmest at 2.8 R-value
Read Review: My Favorite NEMO Sleeping Pad Just Got Warmer, More Sustainable
The NEMO Tensor Sleeping Pad ($200) has always been wide, supportive, quiet, and relatively warm. The original Tensor was somewhere between good and great. It was upgraded in 2022, and the results are top-notch. Sharing similar tech with the toasty Tensor EC above, this pad is plush and comfortable.
The pad’s improvements come from the inside out. NEMO redesigned its Spaceframe — what the brand calls the structural baffles inside the pad that give it support and stability — to make both the insulated and uninsulated pads warmer.
The new baffle design still has individual tack points that prevent the pad from feeling like a raft underneath you, and the insulation is still woven between the baffles in a way that keeps it quiet. There’s no pad squeaking or crinkling while rolling around.
The pad comes with the NEMO Vortex Pump Sack, which inflates all sizes of the pad quickly and efficiently without filling the pad with moisture from your breath.
It’s available in mummy and rectangular shapes, two lengths, and as both insulated and uninsulated options. Though the NEMO Tensor Trail pad is light and compact enough to use for backpacking, it’s plenty comfortable and durable for car camping too. The only drawback here is weight.
The larger version of this pad is approaching a pound. All that comfy real estate has to weigh something, though, and it only weighs a few ounces more than the NeoAir XLite. Folks who typically have trouble sleeping in the backcountry should consider the Tensor Trail over our top pick.
NEMO Flyer
Check Price at REICheck Price at Backcountry
5.2
How we rate products ⓘ
Specifications
- Weight: 1 lb., 6 oz.
- R-value: 3.3
- Thickness: 2"
- Lengths Available: Regular (72"), Long (76")
- Width: Regular (20"), Wide (25")
- Packed Size: 6.5" x 10"
- Shell Material: 100% recycled PU polyester, Bluesign approved
- Insulation Type: Open-cell foam
Pros
- Foam durability and padding
- Plus air pad comfort
- Self-inflating
Cons
- Heavier/bulkier than some other options
- Not super thick
Read Review: NEMO Flyer: The World’s First Baffled Self-Inflating Air Pad
The NEMO Flyer ($140) combines the best of foam-core comfort with air bed packability. At 1 pound, 6 ounces, it’s not the lightest, most packable option, but the added comfort is worth it if you don’t mind a few more ounces.
As one of our reviewers noted, “The NEMO Flyer is a lightweight, three-season pad that hits the sweet spot between an air pad and a self-inflating foam pad. The unique air-filled foam baffles create stable, cushioned thickness with more durability and resistance to bottoming than an air pad, with a slight weight and bulk penalty. But it’s lighter and packs smaller than a self-inflating pad.”
We got to take a look at the updated Flyer for 2023, and can confirm that it is still worthy of the pad’s stellar reputation. This popular hybrid design is now made with Bluesign-approved fabrics and is produced in a resource-conserving way that greatly reduces its impact on the environment. We’re big fans of that.
Right out of the bag, we were initially impressed by how quickly the Flyer inflates, whether you want to let it fill up by itself or top it off with your own breath. This thing deploys fast, which is a welcome reprieve from the light-headed task of inflating full-on air pads.
The low-profile valve is pretty easy to use and allows you to make micro-adjustments to the pad’s firmness. We did find it a bit difficult to let small amounts of air out while making adjustments, though, as air would sometimes continue to seep out of the two-way valve until blowing into again or putting the cap back on.
The 3.3 R-value is a solid boost from a dedicated foam pad like the NEMO Switchback, but the added bulk may not be worth it for some. We also appreciate how soft and quiet the outer fabric is, which contributes to a restful night of sleep.
Overall, this is a great option for those who love the reliability and ease of a foam pad but may want a bit more of the loft and comfort found in air pads.
Backpacking Sleeping Pad Comparison Chart
| Backpacking Sleeping Pad | Price | Weight | R-Value | Thickness | Material |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Therm-a-Rest NeoAir XLite NXT | $200-240 | 13 oz. | 4.5 | 3″ | 30D ripstop HT nylon |
| Klymit Static V | $65 | 1 lb., 2.6 oz. | 1.3 | 2.5″ | Polyester |
| NEMO Tensor Elite | $230 | 8.3 oz. | 2.4 | 3″ | 10D Cordura nylon ripstop |
| Therm-a-Rest NeoLoft | $240 | 1 lb., 9 oz. | 4.7 | 4.6″ | 50d poly knit (top), 75d poly knit (bottom) |
| Therm-a-Rest NeoAir XTherm NXT | $240 | 15.5 oz. | 7.3 | 3″ | 30D nylon top, 70D nylon bottom |
| Sea to Summit Pursuit | $139 | 1 lb., 5.3 oz. | 3 | 2″ | 20D recycled exterior fabric, closed-cell foam |
| NEMO Switchback | $50-60 | 14.5 oz. | 2 | 0.9″ | PE foam |
| Sea To Summit Ether Lite XR Pro | $229 | 1 lb., 3.8 oz. | 7.4 | 3.9” | 30/40D nylon with TPU lamination, multi-layer TRM reflective insulation |
| NEMO Tensor Extreme Conditions | $250 | 1 lb., 1 oz. | 8.5 | 3.5″ | 20D and 40D GRS-certified & Bluesign-approved nylon |
| Big Agnes Rapide SL | $149 | 1 lb., 2 oz. | 4.8 | 4.25″ | Superlight nylon double ripstop |
| NEMO Quasar 3D Insulated | $160 | 1 lb., 12 oz. | 3.3 | 3.5″ | 30D polyester ripstop |
| Big Agnes Zoom UL | $179 | 14 oz. | 4.3 | 3.5″ | Nylon |
| NEMO Tensor Trail | $200-230 | 13.9 oz. | 2.8 | 3″ | 100% PCR PU polyester, Bluesign certified |
| NEMO Flyer | $140-160 | 1 lb., 6 oz. | 3.3 | 2″ | 100% recycled PU polyester, Bluesign approved |
The quality of your sleeping pad can make or break your backpacking trip; (photo/Eric Phillips)
How We Tested the Best Backpacking Sleeping Pads
Our Expert Testers
From weekend warriors to fast and light thru-hikers, the GearJunkie team is made up of avid backpackers. We’ve spent hundreds of hours blowing air into sleeping pad nozzles, and we’ve repeatedly experienced the sadness of a mysterious midnight deflation.
Contributors Mallory Paige and Austin Beck-Doss led the charge in the creation of this guide back in May 2021, accruing our initial selection of 10 sleeping pads. Seasoned pros in the backpacking realm, both authors have paid their dues on rough backcountry trails, and are intimately familiar with the necessity of sound sleep on any demanding adventure.
Senior Editor Chris Carter now leads testing on this guide and has significant experience sleeping atop various inflatables, having thru-hiked the Pacific Crest Trail, the Continental Divide Trail, and the Appalachian Trail. He knows the importance of consistent Zs on trail and is meticulously choosy about the portable beds he picks for the wild.
Our Testing Process and Testing Grounds
Our primary considerations while testing are packed size, comfort, warmth, and ease of use. When backpacking, the ratio between weight and comfort is all-important, so we paid extra attention when examining these two specs.
Secondly, we looked at durability and value. These pads were carefully inspected and repeatedly slept on inside tents and directly under the stars. If you are mainly car camping and aren’t concerned about weight, we focus our critical eye on comfort-focused pads in our guide to the best camping mattresses.
Testing in the field gives us a great big-picture view of how each pad feels and performs as we unpack, inflate, sleep, deflate, and pack them back up again. But taking these pads inside, weighing them, counting breaths to inflate, and comparing them side by side is what helps us distinguish the best of the best.
Our Sleeping Pad Rating System
We’ve keyed in on four different attributes to rate these sleeping pads on to better understand where they stand tall and where they fall a bit short. You can use them to compare pads side by side and better inform your next purchase.
Comfort
Comfort is key, and we look at overall pad thickness, width, and construction when weighing a rating here. When considering air pads, we look for at least 3″ of cushion to rate highly, with that number dropping to 2″ for self-inflating pads. Foam pads, generally, don’t rate very highly in this attribute.
Warmth
The tested R-value of each pad is important when rating for warmth, but it isn’t everything. A pad’s design also has a lot to do with trapping heat, and often, a mummy-shaped pad will rate higher than a rectangle-shaped one due to its more efficient use of space. For summer use, we look for an R-value of at least 3 to rate highly, with a value of at least 5 being required for winter camping.
Packed Size
For backpacking, a compact packed size is important to maintaining a trim backpack, and generally the smaller a pad packs, the higher the rating we assign. Often the most ultralight pads will rate highly here, but trade some performance in comfort and durability for it.
Durability
Finally, we consider season-long durability before rating these pads. We look for material damage on the shell, the operation of the valves, and how well any stuff sacks have held up.
A solid, reliable sleeping pad is essential for maximizing comfort while sleeping, or just hanging around camp; (photo/Honey McNaughton)
Buyer’s Guide: The Best Backpacking Sleeping Pads
A restful night’s sleep sets you up for success on a full day of backpacking adventures. In the past, people rightfully assumed sleeping on a pad on the ground could never match the comfort of a real bed.
However, sleeping pads have improved significantly in recent years. With advancements in cell design and baffling, many high-quality sleeping pads offer exceptional warmth and comfort.
While comfort standards have increased, packed size and weight have also dropped, and the resulting pads are light, easy to use, and wonderful to sleep on.
Because there are so many great pads on the market, it can be difficult to make a selection. In this guide, we break down some of the most important considerations for purchasing the perfect sleeping pad.
In this buyer’s guide, we hope to answer all of your sleeping pad-related questions, from weight and thickness to durability and price.
Types of Sleeping Pads: Foam, Self-Inflating, and Air Pads
Air pads that you inflate with your mouth or a pump sack are usually on the lighter, more packable end of the spectrum, but can be more prone to punctures; (photo/Chris Carter)
There are three types of backpacking sleeping pads: air pads, foam pads, and self-inflating pads. Each category has its own list of pros and cons, and it’s important to understand the differences between them.
Air Pads
Air pads are the lightest and most compact type of sleeping pad. When not in use, they can be deflated and packed into a small stuff sack about the size of a water bottle. Because most of their insulation is trapped in air, they can become quite thick without excess weight or bulk.
Compared to other categories, air pads are the most vulnerable to punctures and air valve issues. Punctures are usually fixable with the proper supplies, but some people avoid air pads due to the puncture risk.
Air pads tend to be the lightest and most packable of the three types of backpacking pads; (photo/Honey McNaughton)
Most pads come with repair kits for punctures or tears, but our testers have had good luck with trusty Tenacious Tape in a pinch or even super glue for fixing issues around the valve.
Self-Inflating Pads
Self-inflating pads have been around for many decades. Most pads in this category combine inflation with open-cell foam to decrease puncture risk and increase durability.
However, self-inflating pads do not pack down as small as air pads, and they tend to be a bit heavier. If these pads do puncture or deflate, you’ll still have some padding between you and the ground, but it won’t be a super comfortable night’s sleep.
Foam Pads
Foam pads such as NEMO’s Switchback are nearly indestructible and can be deployed in seconds; (photo/Honey McNaughton)
Closed-cell foam pads are the original backpacking sleep system technology. Although these tend to be the least comfortable pad style, they are extremely reliable and can last for decades if treated with care.
On a foam pad, you can sleep soundly without worrying about punctures. Usually, foam pads fold or roll to pack away, but they take up far more space in your pack than other types of pads and often have to be strapped to the outside.
Weight
The goal of backpacking is always to minimize the total weight of your pack, particularly when hiking with ultralight backpacks. These days, thick and comfortable pads that are also lightweight offer an ideal solution for backpackers.
Some single-person pads can weigh as little as half a pound, while heftier options may weigh 2 pounds. For a good balance between weight and durability, consider a pad that weighs 14-18 ounces.
Truly ultralight fiends will often carry a torso-length pad, and use their backpack or foam back panel as the insulation for their legs. This greatly cuts base weight but can be a gamble in chilly conditions. Figure out your threshold of comfort, and dial in on a comfort-to-weight ratio that allows you to cruise the miles with ease while getting a full night’s rest when the sun goes down.
Thickness
On uneven or rocky ground, a thin pad will feel only slightly better than lying on the bare earth. As a general rule, thicker pads are more comfortable. However, thickness does add weight and bulk, so we suggest you aim to find a happy medium.
If you are a back sleeper, your weight will be a bit more evenly distributed, and you may be able to get by with a thinner pad. Side sleepers tend to prefer thicker pads, such as the Therm-a-Rest Neoloft.
Any inflatable pad over 3.5 inches thick will be on the more plush side, whereas most foam pads are less than 1 inch thick.
Comfort
Generally, pads made for backpacking will be less plush than pads made for car-based camping. Because backpackers aim to minimize weight, pure comfort is not the priority.
Still, many modern pads offer a generous combination of insulation, padding, and sleeping area all in a lightweight package. For some backpackers, a bit of extra weight is a small price to pay for added comfort.
While stack height isn’t the only determining factor in how comfortable a pad is, it plays a large role. The pads on this list range from under 1 inch to 4 inches thick. Thicker pads obviously land on the heavier, bulkier fringe of the spectrum, but offer plush comfort compared to thinner pads, which bottom out easily. This is particularly true if you are a chronic side sleeper.
R-Value Explained
The higher the R-value a pad has, the warmer it will be for cold, windy nights under the stars; (photo/Honey McNaughton)
The R-value of a pad describes the amount of insulation between the user and the ground. Insulation prevents your body heat from escaping into the earth below. Without a well-insulated pad, sleeping on the ground is very chilly, even when the air temperature is reasonably warm.
In warmer conditions, a sleeping pad with an R-value of less than 3 should be sufficient. However, if you plan to backpack in the shoulder seasons, you’ll be better off with a higher rating (between 3 and 5). For winter camping or mountaineering, an R-value of at least 5 (like the Exped Ultra 7R at 7.1) is the way to go.
Higher R-values are attained in various ways depending on the design, but they generally involve suspending various layers of reflective film within the pad on vertical “trusses” (flexible supports within the pad). These sheets reflect body heat back at the user and guard against radiant heat loss — all while deflecting cold seeping in from the ground.
As insulation technology develops, manufacturers are able to attain better and better warmth-to-weight ratios and dial in on impressively high R-values while keeping weight to a minimum. NEMO’s new Tensor Extreme Conditions is a prime example of this.
Boasting an absurdly high 8.5 R-value, it has a modest minimum trail weight of 17 ounces. Similarly, the Exped Dura 8R has a high R-value of 7.8. Models like these allow backpackers to maintain an ultralight loadout while adventuring in truly arctic conditions.
While most backpackers won’t need such high R-values for their backpacking trips, it can be nice to have for the occasional winter excursion, or stretches of chilly, high-altitude trail on longer journeys like thru-hikes.
Sleeping Pad Dimensions
You want to make sure that the pad you use is big enough for your comfort, but also packs down small enough for a lightweight backpacking trip; (photo/Chris Carter)
Sleeping pads typically come in various sizes, and users can choose the option that best suits their body and preferences. Common sizes include regular, which is usually around 6 feet long, and large, which tends to be closer to 80 inches. Pad width also varies, but anywhere between 18 and 26 inches is fairly standard.
When deciding on the best width for your needs, consider how voluminous your sleeping bag is, and if you tend to wear bulky cold-weather clothes while sleeping. Trying to balance on a narrow pad while bundled up in a bulky cocoon can result in a poor night of rest.
Most backpacking pads are semi-rectangular in shape, and some taper down and become more narrow toward the feet. Two-person sleeping pads are also available, but they’re quite cumbersome and generally not ideal for backpacking.
If you are consistently hiking with a partner, however, they can be a feasible, streamlined option, if one partner carries most of the weight of your two-person tent, and the other carries the two-person pad. Whatever pad you decide to go with, make sure it fits comfortably inside your backpacking tent.
Packed Size
A pad’s packed size depends on construction, materials, and the amount of insulation. Air pads with minimal additional built-in insulation tend to pack down smaller than all other types of pads. Most air pads fit easily into a backpacking pack — some are no larger than a football.
Packed size can be an issue for foam and self-inflating pads. Once fully rolled, these pads can be quite cumbersome, and they often have to be carried on the outside of your backpacking backpack.
Inflation and Deflation
While foam pads do not require inflation to use, all other pad types are built with an integrated air valve. Historically, valves have been the weak point of sleeping pads, and they can be difficult to replace once broken.
But now, high-quality backpacking pads come with reliable valves that are airtight and offer quick and easy inflation and deflation.
Most air pads have flat valves, which include an internal flap that prevents air from escaping in between inflation breaths. These valves are simple and durable, and most pads with flat valves can be inflated with somewhere between 10 and 25 breaths.
These types of valves will also often include the ability to make micro-adjustments to the amount of air in your pad, even while fully weighted. This can be nice if you decide you want a bit of a cushier feel mid-sleep.
Self-inflating pads are designed to fill up on their own once the valve is open, but they usually need some regular inflation breaths to fully pump up and become firm.
Its innovative WingLock valve makes inflating and deflating the XLite a breeze; (photo/Honey McNaughton)
Durability
With proper maintenance, a good backpacking pad can last for many years with regular use. Foam pads can take lots of abuse and last forever, but inflatable pads are fragile and must be handled with care.
Punctures are the main threat to air pads. As with all outdoor gear, abrasion resistance, and fabric thickness are measured with a denier rating. Thick fabric is more resistant to punctures. Air pad denier ratings vary widely, from around 15-denier to 80-denier.
As a rule, always clear away any potentially sharp objects from underneath your sleeping surface before setting up your tent. When sleeping on your pad, the use of a tent footprint creates an extra barrier between your pad and the ground. It’s also wise to keep your pad away from fires that may spit sparks and bits of hot ash.
As the standard has moved toward lightweight backpacking pads, many companies are using thin and potentially vulnerable materials. As with all ultralight gear, durability is not the priority. The lifespan of a lightweight pad will depend on how well it is cared for, and the precautions you take when setting up camp.
The Z Lite Sol foam sleeping pad is so durable that it can be carried on the outside of your pack without concern; (photo/Eric Phillips)
Caring For and Storing Sleeping Pads
Best practices for storing a pad depend on the type of pad you own. Self-inflating pads should be stored unrolled with the valve open to maintain the loft of the insulation. Air pads can be stored rolled up, but always keep them in a stuff sack and make sure they are fully deflated.
For foam pad storage, avoid leaving heavy items on top of the pad. Also, if you store a foam pad rolled up, it may be difficult to get it to lay flat in the future, though the z-pad design prevents this.
While you are rolling your pad up in the morning, make sure to wipe any leaves, twigs, or dirt off your pad. Storing a tightly rolled pad with debris in it could cause small abrasions in the face fabric, and even holes in extreme cases, as the pad jostles around inside your backpack or car.
Also, using a pump sack to inflate your pad will help prolong its life, by reducing the amount of moisture buildup in the pad from your breath. If you can, try and use the often included pump sack to inflate your pad each night instead of your mouth.
Properly caring for your pad will allow you to enjoy many years of camp comfort; (photo/Eric Phillips)
Pump Sacks: Do They Work?
Some air pads come with pump sacks that allow you to pump up your pad without breathing into a valve. Pump sacks decrease inflation time and prevent breath moisture from getting inside your pad (which can lead to a variety of problems). It also helps you avoid getting light-headed by having to blow it up with your mouth after a long hot day in the sun.
Also, many pump sacks double as stuff sacks, and they generally don’t add much weight to your setup. Some of our testers like to fill them with spare clothes and use them as makeshift pillows.
Pump sacks come in all different shapes and sizes, and some are better than others. During testing, we found the sacks that come with the Sea to Summit Ether Light and NEMO Tensor Extreme Conditions to be the most efficient, easiest-to-use models for swiftly inflating your pad.
However, many backpackers feel pump sacks have solved a problem that didn’t exist in the first place. While some people swear by them, they are not a necessary item in most instances. You can prolong the life of your pad by using a pump sack, though, particularly with pads like the Exped Ultra 7R and the Dura 8R, which have a down filling that could be damaged by excessive moisture buildup.
Several pads, including Exped’s Ultra 7R, come with a pump sack that helps with inflation speed, saves your breath, and keeps moisture out of the interior; (photo/Chris Carter)
Women’s-Specific Sleeping Pads
Some sleeping pads have a women’s version or are designed specifically for women. They often look quite similar to their unisex cousins, but there are some differences that many female adventurers may appreciate.
For starters, they will sometimes be wider and more cushioned at the hips, and will often have a greater R-value overall than the unisex version. Many are also made a little shorter. While these are minor changes, they could provide a significant comfort boost for certain people.
Price & Value
What’s the price of a good night’s sleep? The answer takes us back to good old supply and demand. Some of us could sleep like a baby on a $40 closed-cell foam pad (or just in the dirt) in our 20s. Now, older, wiser, and nursing a lifetime of aches and pains, we’re willing to cough up a bit more for a thicker, more comfortable inflatable pad.
A few of us are even willing to carry a little more weight for comfort. When considering how much you’d like to spend, keep in mind that sleeping well means you’ll be more alert and adept at whatever you’re trying to accomplish out there, be it crushing miles, summiting peaks, or making powder turns.
Budget
The simplest, cheapest pads available are made with closed-cell foam. The venerable Therm-a-Rest Z Lite Sol and the slightly thicker NEMO Switchback ($50) are trail staples that can be used alone or combined with an inflatable pad for more insulation and protection from the ground. They’re also pretty much indestructible.
While we’ve seen critters snack on the edges of foam pads, they can’t pop since they’re not inflatable. You’ll never have to worry about waking up in the middle of the night with just a deflated pad between you and the hard, cold ground.
Inflatable pads are undeniably more comfortable, and the Klymit Static V ($65) is a solid budget choice that’s thicker and more packable than foam pads. It has a pretty low R-value of 1.3 and weighs just over a pound. You’ll need to spend quite a bit more for a lighter, warmer pad, but if most of your outdoor recreating happens in the warmer months, the Static V will do the trick.
Mid-Tier
Spending $100-200 will get you an inflatable pad with substantially more insulative properties and better comfort. These pads often include some type of synthetic insulation lightly spread throughout, puncture and tear-resistant fabrics, and sometimes a pump sack. While not considered “ultra light,” they’re still very pack packable and most weigh around a pound to a pound and a half.
At the upper end of this tier is the Sea to Summit Ether Light XT ($189). Weighing just under a pound with an R-value of 3.8, it’s much more versatile than the budget pads and will allow you to stretch your season a little longer into the fall.
It also has a pump sack so you can inflate the pad without blowing moisture in. The NEMO Flyer ($140) also sits in this tier and uses a combination of air and foam for a plush feel. Unpack it, and the expanding foam will draw in air, making it nearly self-inflatable.
Premium
Pay more, and you’ll compromise less when it comes to weight, warmth, and comfort. At $200 and above, the premium pads employ the latest technical fabrics, insulation, and designs.
The Therm-a-Rest NeoAir XLite NXT ($200) is our top choice for sleeping pads due to its excellent balance of warmth and weight, weighing a scant 13 ounces with an R-value of 4.5. At the extreme end of the warmth scale is the winter-ready NEMO Tensor Extreme Conditions ($250) with an R-value of 8.5 while only weighing 15 ounces.
Using lighter fabrics also allows you to go bigger while keeping the weight down, and the largest rectangular version of the NEMO Tensor Trail weighs around a pound. If you tend to toss and turn at night, this pad has room to sprawl.
Getting ready for a chilly fall night on the Exped Ultra 7R; (photo/Honey McNaughton)
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the most comfortable backpacking sleeping pad?
Different backpackers have different comfort preferences. The most comfortable pad is the one that allows you to sleep soundly after a full day of hiking. Before you purchase a pad, make sure that it meets your criteria for size, thickness, materials, price, and above all else, comfort.
What is a good weight for a backpacking sleeping pad?
On the low end, lightweight air pads can be as little as 8 ounces. Heavy foam pads may weigh well over a pound. A four-season pad will contain more material and insulation, and a total weight between 12 and 18 ounces is normal.
Foam pads are quick to set up, lightweight, and durable, but don’t offer quite as much comfort as inflatable pads; (photo/Chris Carter)
What is the best sleeping pad for side sleepers?
Side sleepers will want a thicker pad than back sleepers. If you consistently sleep on your side, consider purchasing an air pad that is at least 3 inches thick. The Therma-a-Rest NeoLoft scored high marks from our side sleepers.
What sleeping pad has the highest R-value?
For cold-weather or winter camping, you’ll want a sleeping pad with an R-value of at least 5. The Sea to Summit Comfort Plus Insulated or Exped Ultra 7R pads fit the bill.
Pads like Rab’s Ionosphere 5.5 boast high R-values, making them prime choices for cold-weather camping; (photo/Honey McNaughton)
Backpacking
The Best Backpacking Sleeping Bags of 2025
We’ve found the best backpacking sleeping bags for every environment and budget, with top picks from Therm-a-Rest, Mountain Hardwear, NEMO, and more.
Packs
The Best Backpacking Backpacks of 2025
Head into the backcountry with the best backpacking backpacks of 2025. From budget-friendly options to ultra-comfortable picks, we’ve got you covered.